It has come to my attention that sometimes in discussing the more interesting facets of an illustrator, some of the "basics" can be overlooked. Take
Harry Clarke (1890-1931) for example. Harry Clarke is one of my favorites of the period. Over the past few years there has been a VIEW post on some really
hard-to-find Clarke works, and he was mentioned again in reference to a collected work, more recently. To not offer a look at why I think he's worth some more study, is just, well, wrong. So let's fix that.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d534/7d5342fe17775a14db1b27349a76b45a21bfbee6" alt=""
In the small amount of time that Clarke had to share his genius with
the world, he managed to explore a few creative avenues. Stained glass
design may be what he applied most of his time and talent to, and in his
native Ireland there still exist many examples of his fine glass work. I
found Harry Clarke while in my teens, during an after-Christmas book
sale, when a reprint of
Poe's Tales of Mystery and Imagination
came into my possession. Like many designer/illustrators of the Golden
Age, Clarke had the opportunity to do a number of gift books, his were
from 1915-1925. The Poe volume is his best known, and easiest to obtain a
reprint of. (It was one of the first selected for the Calla reprint
program, as well) Clarke's others are not as easy to find, though a
reprint of his
Fairy Tales of Charles Perrault will be available this Fall. Another of Clarke's prizes is his
Fairy Tales by Hans Christian Andersen. All of the works shown here come from that volume. I'm looking at Clarke in a
Fine Lines and Solid Blacks segment because I think his ink work is exceptional in his use of pattern and understanding of
value—value
here meaning the transition(s) between blacks, grays, and whites, and
how their relative placement on the picture plane affects the
composition. A viewer can observe these images at a glance, or choose to
dig deeper and deeper into them, where a single plate can tell its own
story. Clarke's color illustration doesn't present with the same
intensity through simplicity—black and white—and loses something in the printing,
according to some who have seen his originals.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b85d6/b85d6fa12f6ca1c9a7e5b314c76c90b6aa37ebc8" alt=""
There has been a kind of scholarly-reawakening in
regards to Clarke in the last five years, but it does look to his glass
work primarily.
You can keep up with that
here—
and as mentioned in that earlier VIEW blog, here's the link to Jim
Vadeboncouer's page on Clarke.
Back shortly. Jeff